So Alone and Mystified

Stately in his own peculiar way, and  not at all plump, Bob Dylan offered the good people of Cork and whatever auslanders were in the house last night, a strange and beautiful St Augustine that you may hear in a very nice recording that I may or may not have linked to successfully here. If I didn’t, please forgive me and track it down elsewhere.

The last time he performed the song was also in Ireland, in Dublin on 11/26/05–I had the vast pleasure to be in the audience for that, and now still breathing and able to hear the song’s newest life.  His voice is bedrock and also pure air and very fastidious word-to-word. The harmonica solo touchingly recalls the original and then picks up its own strength.  It’s one of those deeply focused performances that draws the listener in so close that one lyric change can startle.

In my corner of the globe, I don’t expect to get  the green jacket, regrettably– many thanks to whoever is responsible for this superb recording, and safe travels to Mr. Dylan and the band–we’ll see you at Jones Beach. Bring whatever you got.

North Country

Here is a photo I took last week of something Bob Dylan passed many times as a teenager.  It is the panel protecting a fire extinguisher set into a niche   left of the entrance to the Hibbing High School auditorium. It’s a captivating thing for a few reasons, even inside a building that captivates your attention and admiration every couple of feet. For Fire is aurally lovely, with its alliteration and near-rhyme. And I like the ambiguity of the stately phrase: For Fire. Perhaps if I happen to need fire, I can find the ingredients behind this panel. Perhaps if fire itself requires sustenance,  it can get what it needs behind this panel. The jewel tones of the lettering, the elegant pattern of the leaded glass, may remind you of Tiffany-style glasswork, and indeed, this fire extinguisher is protected by the work of Louis Tiffany’s studio.  I’d like to say I can imagine a boy with a sharp and mobile attention, and a sensitivity to color and wordplay, being fleetingly entertained by this familiar object, but I’m not good at that kind of fanciful reverie. It’s more true to say that hundreds of hours of attention to Bob Dylan’s songs has heightened my own sensitivities to color and wordplay and strangeness. In the emergency for which this artful business was designed, the beautiful panel would be in the way, and almost be certainly be shattered. Of course that is the way of things, and that  is something else I hear often enough in Bob Dylan’s songs.

Back to Hibbing, and other  emergencies. Here is another photo I took of railroad tracks leading into and out of Hibbing, where young Zimmerman may or may not have had a frightening sort-of accident on a motorcycle. At that time, maybe a half dozen people had a strong personal interest in his safety. Mythology invites us to symbolize these old tracks as destiny leading our restless young genius out of the torpid, suffocating little town.  And we’re talking fulfilled destiny here. A mere 6 years after he rode out of Hibbing, this young man’s clumsiness on a motorbike would galvanize the attention of thousands of people on more than one continent, and be written about in decades to come as an important turn in an important artist’s wheel.

In No Direction Home, you can hear Bob Dylan make short work of finding himself a restless young something or other in a small town. Hibbing is distinguished by being the very first of countless places Dylan has left, and a visit to Hibbing can offer anyone evidence that it is not simply Anywhere, USA. The changeling living in the Zimmerman home may have fled with more than  appetite and ambition.

This street sign and fire hydrant are the lonely gatekeepers to what looks like a grassy tree-filled park. The park is curiously marked with flat slabs of concrete and short flights of steps that are set into the grass and lead nowhere. This is the site of the original town of Hibbing, once called North Hibbing, which was the lifeline to and from the iron mines.  The mines grew, and the town grew, and soon they were too close for profit on the one hand and comfort and safety on the other. A settlement began a short distance south of North Hibbing, and after legal and political strife, negotiations, allurements,  pragmatism, and other inducements, the town moved south. On rollers pulled by horses and then engines, homes and businesses and public buildings were towed about a mile and a half.  People ended up opening their same doors on to different streets.  Fixtures like fire hydrants, street signs and lamps, and foundations were impractical or unnecessary to either move or remove. A visitor to old North Hibbing can walk upon the remains of  a community abandoned through vigor and ingenuity and compromise and compulsion, very different from walking upon the fertile remains of a battlefield or a town lost to flooding or other atrocity. You feel quiet and lonesome there and the place seems alive with the simple sadness of any benign ghost, anything necessarily lost. The past is very close behind in North Hibbing, and uncommonly so.

This is the Hull-Rust-Mahoning Mine in Hibbing over 100 years after iron ore was first discovered there. It looks uncannily natural to me, an impressive geological formation. The one or two trucks I saw trundling busily among the piles of earth seemed unmanned exploratory vehicles, bravely and mysteriously purposeful. At the time of our restless young something or other’s childhood, the mines in Hibbing produced 25% of the country’s iron ore. Within the history of late 19th-early 20th century  European emigration to the US, Hibbing must stand out a little, due to the disproportion between the voracity of the mines’ need for labor, and the size and isolation of their setting. Men poured in from Finland,  Ukraine,  Italy, their different skills put to work in the mines themselves and in the town they built. The demands of mining brutally demanded cooperation, the climate brutally reduced  many cultural distinctions to shared survival tactics, and quarters were close.  Assimilation was fairly rapid, rough, and compulsory.  In a coastal city, or an inland city with a greater variety of industries and more accessibility to other cities or large towns, a significant immigrant  population can lead to cosmopolitanism, in which a fluid in-and-out population is constantly refreshing culture.  Something different seems to have happened in Hibbing.  Difference was accommodated, tolerance was a necessity, yet the flexibility of the diverse community was also bounded and isolated, rather than continually challenged and renewed.

And this photo is partly what this kind of assimilation looks like. In 1954, Robert Zimmerman’s parents hired a Rabbi for their son’s Hebrew lessons in preparation for his Bar Mitzvah, which was hosted here at The Androy Hotel in the downtown Hibbing, and was attended by something like 200 people. We do wrong to condescendingly applaud this small town for an impressive level of tolerance, and if you’ve ever read Beatty Zimmerman’s adamant refusal to indulge any question of outsiderness in her life on the Iron Range, she must be taken at face value. This is the cooled crucible of assimilation.

I’ve visited Hibbing High School twice, and it’s been a singularity for me both times. It is magnificent in its material self, and not merely remarkable as an artifact of frontier ambition. I am thinking of buildings I’ve visited whose united design and function   humble and ennoble whoever enters them, and this simply is one of them. I’ve been a high school teacher and I can guess that apathy, dishonesty, impatience, and ignorance live there–in students, teachers, and administrators– as they do in any American high school, and still the building has the persistent solid rich thrum of a monument.  Day after day for years, our restless young something or other would have passed the paintings in these photos. Oil paintings flank the walls along either side of the grand entrance staircase. On one side, the history of America, on the other side, the history of Minnesota.  There is the intrepid mother and child entering the frontier they would help civilize, there is the ritual of civilization created through the testaments of powerful men. Our restless young something or other walked a gauntlet of symmetrical memorialized history day after day after day.

Bob Dylan sings, When I left my home, the sky split open wide. His Hibbing was a city of seams. Healed ruptures.  He grew healthy and protected upon healed ruptures of land, of Old World poverty, of ethnic and national hatred or incomprehensibility.  A seam is not false and it’s not a lie, but there may be a sarcophagal quality, a  nervelessness to it that would be intolerable to a certain sensibility. The splitting of the sky seems exactly the right rupture for this sensibility. Welcome to the infinite demands of the right now–will  you be ready for it forever?, is what the sky splitting open wide seems to say. Let’s say this was the first time he answered: Try me.

Make the trip to Hibbing. It is not a symbolic pilgrimage. You’ll find an unforgettable vein of American history in the spaces there, and you’ll find people deeply and presently conscious of their own personal histories. The people of Hibbing welcome visitors and pander to no one, not to Bob Dylan, and not to Bob Dylan fans. Find Linda and Bob Hocking at Zimmy’s and learn what intelligent hospitality looks like. They pander to nothing and they will embrace you according to the way that you live. That’s all, I’m done.  You must go to Hibbing.

More And More And More And More

As a child in New York, I remember being taken to the UN for any number of those elementary school trips that seemed to have no real purpose–Mrs. Wasserstein’s run out of numbers for multiplication tables, Randy Schumann looks like he’s going to be acting up again, everyone put on your little jackets, we’re going to the United Nations. And when you’re 7 or 8 years old, there is a terrible glorious magic to the UN because you are told over and over–”Now remember, once we are in that building, we are no longer in America.”  This was the closest I would get to Narnia, and despite the fact that the inside of the UN looked like the lobbies to museums and office buildings I was familiar with, the magic always worked to make me feel thrillingly if meaninglessly away and different.  I expected to see people fly through the air, and friendly talking animals, and I’ll suddenly be grown up. These fantasies inevitably were blasted to nothing by the real magic in the lobby. The pendulum.  A suspended metal weight swings rhythmically around a circle and an adult explains that the earth’s orbit is making the metal cylinder move. It will keep moving till the world ends. And if you’re 7 or 8, you stare at the swinging weight and you feel certain that you see it slow down, you do–right now! I’m on 46th street but I’m not in America, and the earth is not the solid sidewalks I think it is, and to top off all the marvels,  I think I see the world ending this moment.  Randy Schumann points at an African diplomat crossing the lobby and asks Mrs. Wasserstein in a loud voice, “How come that man can wear a dress to work?”

Apparently we are indeed facing the end of the world, tomorrow, May 21, 2011, EST, so it is a good thing that I have the time today to write my Bob Dylan Birthday post.  So much of being a Bob Dylan fan is time-bending, time-traveling, end-of-times, beginnings-of-times. Therefore, it will be a fine synchronicity if the pendulum on 46th street winds down for real tomorrow. I am grateful that having been a neurotic and imaginative child rehearsed the proper state of mind for all collapses of time and reality.

So just two days ago I’m standing right where this photo was taken, on the corner of 60th street and 5th Ave in Brooklyn. I’m listening to Seven Curses on my iPod, and I’m waiting to hear “…hanging branch abandoned,” my favorite phrase in the song.  I love the sound of those four As, and abandoned is a word I particularly savor in Dylan’s songs. For the umami feel of the word. He always gets so much thereness in those syllables that reference leaving-for-good. Abandoned it out West. Before I abandon it.  A faith that’s been long abandoned. All their earthly principles they’re gonna have to abandon.

The building above occupies the entire block between 59th and 60th streets and 5th and 6th avenues. It  is a basilica named Our Lady of Perpetual Help. I stand on the corner, I hear Reilly’s daughter seeing the bare tree, I look at the church, and a wisp of a thought starts to curl.  All the crosses in Dylan’s songs, and his special attention to the crucified Jesus.  The nailed, suspended, suffering, sacrificial image of Jesus seems of a piece with all the hangings Dylan’s sung:  Hezekiah Jones high as a pigeon, Reilly the horse thief, the malign postcards, Rosemary on the gallows, the judge warning Jim Jones not to get too gay in Botany Bay…to the sign on the cross, the thief on the cross.   Nothing but a wisp, standing at the crossroads of how many different epochs? The moments of each of these songs in their composition, their performances, my listenings. And the times out of time in the dream of eternity which we hear in some of Dylan’s hanging songs, and  in the building across the street from where I stand and have this wispy thought.

Back home that evening, I have a treat. Keith Richards has posted footage of his appearance with  Bob Dylan at the 1991 Seville Guitar Expo. Bob Dylan in his Forest Hills-Unplugged polka dots is elegant, rumpled, and rockstarish. He introduces Keith, who takes his side of the stage with command and good cheer. They light into a Shake Rattle and Roll that doesn’t really roll anywhere, but you want it to roll on and on forever regardless, watching the two gentlemen trading vocals, leaning into their microphones. I’d never seen this clip before, and there I was in 1991, impatient with closeups of the saxophone player. The money shot comes in the last few seconds of the clip, after the song is done.  The camera follows Dylan loping off the stage, then alone across the wide empty backstage area and finally to an exit–Dylan hunched, private, and fleeing at his own pace. Thanks to my 2011 technologies, I can watch his hasty retreat as many times as I like.

And just last night I got to hear something I’d never heard before: a recording of Dylan and The Band in St Louis in 1974. The general sound of the recording brought back memories of shows I was attending at the time, before I knew Bob Dylan existed. You can hear that big arena sound, all about loud, and the comfortable swelling roars of thousands of people allowed to smoke dope to their hearts’ content.

In this technically primitive recording, Dylan’s voice is very big and very loud and you don’t miss a word.  It’s 74, and he’s belting out every syllable, every consonant a bullet. For some numbers he seems mainly to be shouting to beat a stopwatch, and for others,  you simply wonder if what you know is wrong, that human energy maybe is not quantifiable. Here he sings/tells the story of Desolation Row with a weird prosaic intensity that tires out the listener while the singer has more breath, and then even more. When he gets to Hollis Brown, the delivery hammers the poignancy of the song and what you get is the ugliness, the screaming wife, the crying children,  Hollis Brown’s pounding head, the heft of the gun, the pile of bodies, hard-baked doom all around. And this being another song that reminds us of certain conditions unaffected by time–sickness, dried up wells, hunger are part of the natural course, and Hollis Brown does not destroy everything because his family starves, but because they starve in isolation, with”no friend.” The line goes from Hollis Brown to What Good Am I?, says another wisp of a thought in my head.

All the attention and folderol of Bob Dylan’s upcoming birthday. If you relish this man’s work, if you’ve felt a particular gratitude to have shared real time with him in the general life span way as well as in concert halls, then you want to mark this Milestone. It’s also true that milestones belong to a straight-line chronology, a chronology that summarizes and memorializes, and  that is nothing like the day-to-day experience of Dylantime if you are a fan in 2011. Dylantime for us is a delirious chutes and ladders life in and out of years and decades,  and always ready at a moment’s notice  for a new encounter with what we thought was familiar.

Nevertheless. Human energy one person at a time is quantifiable, and 70 is a countable number. And with that thought right there, and the chance that we’ll all wake up tomorrow to the end of all time–Bob Dylan, we bless you on this mighty birthday. And if there is eternity, we’ll find you there again.

If Her Hair Was Still Read

I’m pasting and posting here the full texts of Maureen Dowd’s April 9 commentary on Bob Dylan’s China appearances, and Sean Wilentz’s speed-of-light rebuttal.  I’m sure I’m not alone in wishing to thank Prof. Wilentz for taking time that could have been far better spent in productive non-rebuttalesque pursuits to address the carelessness and ignorance distributed through Dowd’s essay. 

Some of her carelessness is easily dismissed, even risible: I don’t see any evidence here that she read the set lists of Dylan’s China shows, nor that her knowledge of his work extends beyond superficial readings of sound bite lyrics.

Some of her carelessness is professional: I don’t see that Dowd offers her readers documentary evidence that Chinese officials of any kind  reviewed and restricted set lists, and evidence that Dylan agreed to the restrictions. Nor does she provide her readers with evidence that she had any contact with Chinese citizens to determine if some of them may have already had  a familiarity with Dylan’s work, rather than being oppressed automatons susceptible to dangerous consciousness-raising upon hearing Blowin’ in the Wind,  and similarly susceptible to being further narcotized by oppression upon not hearing Blowin’ in the Wind.  

Some of her carelessness is rhetorical: Somehow she takes the words of David Hajdu, Sean Wilentz, and Bob Dylan, who all speak to Dylan’s explicit unwillingness to serve as a political mascot or agent, to defend an argument that Dylan  is a hypocrite who has failed an obligation to serve as a political mascot or agent.

For me, her worst carelessness is the flabby devil (hat-tipping here to Joseph Conrad) of armchair moral righteousness.  Bob Dylan is a sell-out because he ostensibly did not serve Maureen Dowd’s pious vision of speaking truth to power in China.  The answer we can offer her comes conveniently in the form of a sound-bite: You shouldn’t let other people get your kicks for you.  Ask Bob Dylan to do what he does, and kick your own kicks.   Read on, and thanks again to Prof. Wilentz for taking the time to rebut with patience.

Blowin’ in the Idiot Wind

By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: April 9, 2011

Bob Dylan may have done the impossible: broken creative new ground in selling out.   The idea that the raspy troubadour of ’60s freedom anthems would go to a dictatorship and not sing those anthems is a whole new kind of sellout — even worse than Beyoncé, Mariah and Usher collecting millions to croon to Qaddafi’s family, or Elton John raking in a fortune to serenade gay-bashers at Rush Limbaugh’s fourth wedding.

Before Dylan was allowed to have his first concert in China on Wednesday at the Worker’s Gymnasium in Beijing, he ignored his own warning in “Subterranean Homesick Blues” — “Better stay away from those that carry around a fire hose” — and let the government pre-approve his set.

Iconic songs of revolution like “The Times They Are a-Changin,’ ” and “Blowin’ in the Wind” wouldn’t have been an appropriate soundtrack for the 2,000 Chinese apparatchiks in the audience taking a relaxing break from repression.

Spooked by the surge of democracy sweeping the Middle East, China is conducting the harshest crackdown on artists, lawyers, writers and dissidents in a decade. It is censoring (or “harmonizing,” as it euphemizes) the Internet and dispatching the secret police to arrest willy-nilly, including Ai Weiwei, the famous artist and architect of the Bird’s Nest, Beijing’s Olympic stadium.

Dylan said nothing about Weiwei’s detention, didn’t offer a reprise of “Hurricane,” his song about “the man the authorities came to blame for something that he never done.” He sang his censored set, took his pile of Communist cash and left.

“The Times They Are Not a-Changin’,” noted The Financial Times under a picture of the grizzled 69-year-old on stage in a Panama hat.

“Imagine if the Tea Party in Idaho said to him, ‘You’re not allowed to play whatever,’ you’d get a very different response,” said an outraged Sophie Richardson of Human Rights Watch.

A 22-year-old Dylan did walk off “The Ed Sullivan Show” when CBS censors told him he couldn’t sing “Talkin’ John Birch Paranoid Blues.”

But he’s the first to admit he cashes in.

David Hajdu, the New Republic music critic, says the singer has always shown a tension between “not wanting to be a leader and wanting to be a celebrity.”

In Hajdu’s book, “Positively 4th Street,” Dylan is quoted saying that critics who charged that he’d sold out to rock ’n’ roll had it backward.

“I never saw myself as a folksinger,” he said. “They called me that if they wanted to. I didn’t care. I latched on, when I got to New York City, because I saw (what) a huge audience there was. I knew I wasn’t going to stay there. I knew it wasn’t my thing. … I became interested in folk music because I had to make it somehow.”

“Folk music,” he concluded, “is a bunch of fat people.”

He can’t really betray the spirit of the ’60s because he never had it. In his memoir, “Chronicles,” he stressed that he had no interest in being an anti-establishment Pied Piper and that all the “cultural mumbo jumbo” imprisoned his soul and made him nauseated.

“I had very little in common with and knew even less about a generation that I was supposed to be the voice of,” he said.

He wrote that he wanted to have a house with a white picket fence and pink roses in back, live in East Hampton with his wife and pack of kids, eat Cheerios and go to the Rainbow Room and see Frank Sinatra Jr. perform.

“Whatever the counterculture was, I’d seen enough of it,” he wrote. He complained of being “anointed as the Big Bubba of Rebellion, High Priest of Protest, the Czar of Dissent.”

Performing his message songs came to feel “like carrying a package of heavy rotting meat,” he wrote.

Hajdu told me that Dylan has distanced himself from his protest songs because “he’s probably aware of the kind of careerism that’s apparent in that work.” Dylan employed propaganda to get successful but knows those songs are “too rigidly polemical” to be his best work.

“Maybe the Chinese bureaucrats are better music critics than we give them credit for,” Hajdu said, adding that Dylan was now “an old-school touring pro” like Frank Sinatra Sr.

Sean Wilentz, the Princeton professor who wrote “Bob Dylan in America,” said that the Chinese were “trying to guard the audience from some figure who hasn’t existed in 40 years. He’s been frozen in aspic in 1963 but he’s not the guy in the work shirt and blue jeans singing ‘Masters of War.’ ”

Wilentz and Hajdu say you can’t really censor Dylan because his songs are infused with subversion against all kinds of authority, except God. He’s been hard on bosses, courts, pols and anyone corrupted by money and power.

Maybe the songwriter should reread some of his own lyrics: “I think you will find/When your death takes its toll/All the money you made/Will never buy back your soul.”

April 10, 2011

The Real Dylan in China

Posted by Sean Wilentz 
New Yorker on line

When it comes to denouncing Bob Dylan as a sell-out, the times they haven’t changed that much in fifty years.

In 1964, Irwin Silber, the editor of the lefty folk music magazine Sing Out!, notoriously blasted Dylan for daring to lay aside his protest material. A product of the Popular Front Communist Left, Silber was offended that Dylan had ceased writing and performing narrowly political songs. Now Maureen Dowd, of the august liberal New York Times, is offended that Dylan failed to perform these same songs during his recent shows in Beijing and Shanghai. Apparently, unless Dylan performs according to a politically-correct line, he is corrupt, even immoral. He is not allowed to be an artist, he must be an agitator. And he can only be an agitator if he sings particular songs.

Dowd isn’t angry that Dylan performed in China. She is angry that he apparently agreed to do so under certain conditions, that he didn’t sing “Blowin’ in the Wind” or “The Times They Are A-Changin’,” and that he didn’t take the opportunity to denounce Chinese human rights policies.

I don’t know exactly what Dylan did or did not agree to. (I don’t think Dowd does, either.) But whatever the facts are, Dylan knows very well—as I tried to tell Dowd when she interviewed me for her column—that his music long ago became uncensorable. Subversive thoughts aren’t limited to his blatant protest songs of long ago. Nor would his political songs from the early nineteen-sixties have made much sense in China in 2011. Dowd, like Mr. Jones in “Ballad of a Thin Man,” is as clueless about all of this as she is smug.

Dowd fumes that Dylan should have sung verses like:

Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don’t stand in the doorway
Don’t block up the hall

 

That would have really riled the Chinese—once they’d figured out what a senator or a congressman was.

Instead, Dylan opened his concerts in Beijing and Shanghai with a scalding song from his so-called gospel period, “Gonna Change My Way of Thinking.”

I’m gonna change my way of thinking
Make myself a different set of rules
Gonna put my best foot forward
Stop bein’ influenced by fools

 

Presumably, he sang some of the revised lyrics in the version that he released with Mavis Staples in 2003:

Jesus is coming
He’s coming back to gather His jewels
Well, we live by the Golden Rule
Whoever got the gold, rules

 

Or maybe he sang the original lyrics:

So much oppression
Can’t keep track of it no more
So much oppression
Can’t keep track of it no more

 

How much more subversive could Dylan have been in Communist China? Especially when he went on to sing “A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall,” “Highway 61 Revisited,” and, most unnerving of all, “Ballad of a Thin Man.” Depending on whatever agreement he made with them, I’d argue Dylan made a fool of the Chinese authorities, while getting paid in the bargain. He certainly made a fool of Maureen Dowd—or she has made a fool of herself.

Should Dylan have berated the Chinese government for cracking down on dissidents? For Dowd, only an explicit statement of denunciation would have sufficed, apparently. But Dylan learned long ago that he is not a particularly good conventional political spokesman. His gifts lie elsewhere, in composing and singing songs of love and loss and the rest of human experience, above and beyond politics, although politics is always there as well. His art has changed the world mightily, and not just in righting political wrongs. Imagine how much he would have changed had he heeded the pinched demands of Irwin Silber—and now Maureen Dowd.

As Each New Season’s Dawn Awaits

What’s nice about a blog is the infinite license to exploit all kinds of appealing contradictions. Lies, trivia, profanity, banality, slander, narcissism, ignorance, and  confessions of malevolent or grotesque desires all appear in attractive layouts with  professional fonts. The ravings of every fool and sinner come across as a formal publication, and although it is certainly possible to ornament these things with clear signs of psychopathology, we all–readers and writers–have come to expect a publication-worthy standard for all ravings . Then there is the irresistible fantasy of everyone and no one reading our unscrolling Times Roman vacuousness or night thoughts: I demand the *freedom* to say exactly what I think and feel with no shackles or repercussions of any kind, and I demand the dream of entranced or  deliciously horrified readers hanging on every word. We must have all of these dichotomies right now, in the new spirit of crying baby gratification that characterizes La Vita Plugged.

So, in this spirit,  I’m going to tell  a story I guess I’ve told already, because I want to,  and it doesn’t matter if I do. On the evening of January 24, 1961,  Bob Dylan stamped snow from his boots, clambered down the steps of Cafe Wha?, struck another match and started anew.  And on the evening of Jan 24, 1961, I was also, in my own small way,  on the verge of an exciting new development. At the very moment Bob Dylan was sizing up the first of the  little basements where there was just enough light for him to learn what he needed to learn, I was also in a tiny dark space farther uptown, albeit  in an upstairs eatery with tablecloths and clean bathrooms, where my parents celebrated their first wedding anniversary over steaks and martinis and my father’s Lucky Strikes, and discussed whether I’d end up Natasha or Roger. These were very different times: pregnant women ate steaks and inhaled secondhand smoke and did not know the sex of their unborn child. Clinton Heylin reports that in late February 1961, Bob Dylan attended a Ramblin’  Jack Elliott concert at Carnegie Recital Hall, while my parents learned how to manage cloth diapers with sharp safety pins, and fortunately agreed that Natasha is a dreadful name for a baby girl. Me, my parents, and Bob Dylan all shivered in the very same cold New York winter at the very same time and developed new habits at the very same time.

In 2011, we’ll have plenty of opportunities to share our immeasurable gratitude  for  the fates and forces that gave Mr. Bob Dylan enough  health and strength to share himself with us for these decades.

For now, let’s travel further into the past than 1961 or 1941. As Michel de Montaigne went out one morning in 1569 or 1570 to take the air around his own estate, he fell off his horse,  and  hit the ground really very hard. Hard enough that he hovered not unpleasantly and not uninterestingly, as he reported,  between life and death for several days. His household and family believed they were tending to their dying master and Montaigne noted their agitations along with the strange repose accompanying  his maybe-almost death.  He recovered, and found himself in a new frame of mind which he chose to take as a new compass for his attention and energies (he had a nice amount of both to spare, being  a landowning nobleman ).  So Montaigne began the project of his Essays which have created for themselves many generations of ardent readers who have very little in common with each other and who would disagree strongly about which Montaigne is the real true Montaigne. This should start to sound familiar.

397 or 398 years later, another affluent young man of leisure falls to the ground and hurts himself, and then picks himself up with a refreshed outlook that he also puts to work in expressive pursuits. Montaigne would find a motorcycle a curious object. Otherwise,   there’s very little in John Wesley Harding that a well-read 16th century French nobleman wouldn’t recognize –the only real anachronisms I can find are a telegraph, and the lightbulb and the record on the liner notes. I also don’t know if gold was measured in carats in the 16th century.

If you have not met Montaigne in his essays, you can meet him–and I do mean meet him, and not read about him–in Sarah Bakewell’s wonderful new book, How to Live?  We travel with Montaigne through his inner and outer lives, and through his Europe, and Bakewell is an ideal guide: too informed to be superficial, too witty to be pompous, too vigorous in her intelligence to be glib and conclusive in her insights. Ignore the book’s marketing, which unfortunately  makes an effort to set it alongside the current trend of  high-class watered-down Philosophy 101 books whose authors shall remain nameless.

I’m only here to get from Montaigne to Bob Dylan. In her introduction, Bakewell touches on the Montaigne of the 21st-century, and the answer is blogs. As she decorously and kindly puts it,

 Even as bloggers and networkers delve into their private experience, they communicate with their fellow humans in a shared festival of the self.

Montaigne’s Essays famously discourse upon Montaigne’s impressions, speculations, opinions, meditations, influences, in what we would call *real time* but was the only time Montaigne himself had to hand. Montaigne  never lost interest in the world filtered through Montaigne, and this is where people like me, we countless millions publicizing our inner lives, come in. Bakewell writes, again with generosity and decorum,

This idea [i.e., blogs/forums/]–writing about oneself to create a mirror in which other people recognize their own humanity–has not existed forever. It had to be invented. And, unlike many cultural inventions, it can be traced to a single person: Michel Eyquem de Montaigne…

The problem being that one person’s invitation to enjoy the companionship of an amiable, curious, and informed inner life is another person’s desultory narcissism. The unfortunate lesson of Montaigne is not exactly the invention of self-articulation without the framework of confessional or historical prompting.  The lesson is that some people’s restless rambles  create a far more worthwhile shared festival of humanity than others.

Here is a portrait of King William IV of England, sometimes known as Old Bill. I don’t know anything about him, but he has a vaguely anxious and pudgy look, and his hair seems on the verge of  dishevelment, so perhaps his inner life is more of the White Rabbit always-too-late type than the Montaigne let’s-take-a-break-and-think-about-this-for-a-moment type. Tell Ol’ Bill could be my very favorite song of restlessness, and I am delighted to find there are many interesting possibilities for the old bills among whom we can pick and choose an origin for the name Ol’ Bill. Many of them have to do with the law, and certainly our song’s hero  seems bound and beleaguered,  and miserably  free as well. There are  certainly many self-imposed forced marches in Bob Dylan’s later songs, and the rambling of Tell Ol’ Bill is a march I always like to accompany him on.

For one moment the singer lies restless in a heavy bed, otherwise he is outside, in a world that is summer and winter and day and night according to his own calendar and clock.  By the river he’s penniless and alone, but he glows with flame (he once also slept by a stream with heaven blazing in his head–water and the burden of inspiration). The flame seems to ignite a song, which he sings to his lonely self.  Hearing his own echoes, he thinks it could all drown him, like Orpheus.  Or like an old man with nothing to his name and with only a river’s whisper for company.

On he goes, then, maybe one smiling face will drive the shadow from his head–the body’s fires apparently can’t light the brain’s shadows. A moment of inspiration cannot undo  the vexations of memory.   The chances of a smilling face retreat in a nameless place, where he is stranded, now tossing on a bed rooted heavily to the lonely ground. 

We move inside the tossing and the vexation, to entreaties. I’ve given much thought to Larry Sloman’s notes on this for Tell Tale Signs–that the song is  the torture of love gone ugly just like so many times before. But every time I come to a hill in Bob Dylan, a high hill especially, and every time kisses are placed on foreheads, I think I’m in a netherspace between Gethsemanes, Golgothas and restless quite ordinary human beds–and this is a space I believe Bob Dylan owns. (Remember that Golgotha means skull, and consider  the amount of  time it is we spend inside the pained confines of the singer’s miserable brain in these later songs–but we don’t like codes. We like….faint whiffs of  suggestions.)

Now we’re hearing a man tormented by memory of love, and memory of destiny thrown to the winds, and the lonesomeness of his own song. He still is on the move. Following that coldest benediction, he is momentarily and suspiciously relieved of doubts and fears, which helps time move very quickly. The seasons are always new, and waters are tranquil lakes and streams, still and friendly. How long does peace last? Only to the next troubled night. The enemy at the gate:  gates of horn are true dreams,  gates of ivory, false dreams.  The enemy is subtle, and sometimes the enemy is real.

The world gone cold, and the sound of the lost one’s voice is ringing off the tongue.  How perfect that ringing is.  It’s got connotations of hard cold metal, of love tokens, of the song that began this journey, and of the circularity of time and peace following pain following peace.

The stars are cold, but the night is young. The night is young.  That romantic cliche is wonderfully placed here as a moment of hackneyed devil-may-care in a song where fate is so bitterly thrown to the clouds and winds.  Now I raise my hand to the gods–tell ol’ Bill the battle’s still on. Tell him–when he comes home–to keep the faith, fight the good fight. Poor Bill is the only creature in the song who has a home, and his friend  the singer would send him right back out of its warmth  to the gray and stony sky above and hard ground beneath. The singer lies about his sad strandedness–I’m not alone!  he says. We have reinforcements! Having sounded this battle charge at the end, he takes one look at the face that matters, breathes out his bravado, and utters the ordinary man’s version of fate. Ordinary convictions of fate  can sound a little like plain insisting that someone else should agree with your version of things:  How could it be any other way?

Whatever “it” is, I don’t care. The whole song seems to be a meditation, or unfolding of the moment of Frost’s Stopping By Woods on a Snowy Evening, wihch is alluded to in line the woods are dark, the town is too. The poem captures that moment of wanting to stop, sink, melt into things once and for all. We’re all heading for cold and dark for good, what are we waiting for? But the horse doesn’t know it’s mortal, and its blind animal impatience to get on with life wakes the rider’s obligation  to keep on keepin’ on. I do think Tell Ol’ Bill‘s cold and exhausting world unfolds up and down and out and in from that mortal restlessness.

The recording sessions for the song that are in circulation are one of the inestimable treasures of the loveandtheft world of bootlegging. Dylan is patiently insistent with the band, and he is self-flustered and something called a “turnaround” gives him a big headache (do not tell me what this is, I don’t want to know).  From the chatter and noodling between takes, there is a moment of empty charged time, the briefest moment when invisible things are gathered up, and in the next moment the shape of the song just happens. The difference between Dylan’s gruff speaking voice and the cadences and textures of the singing, where gruffness is put into many kinds of service, is always a surprise,  something unaccountable. The rhythms of this song hold up to multiple listenings, the one really weak take loses the percussive dark joy of the music, and the take in a minor key is the one you want to go on forever, reminding you infinitely what keepin’ on feels like.

Here is Montaigne’s tower, where he sat and wrote, played with his cat, conferred with his servants, thought about cats and servants, and wrote some more.  Montaigne was  a happy accident of a writer wanting to write about nothing but the world as it occurred to him alone, having the time to do this at great length, and making the result worth our while. Bob Dylan sings that secret thoughts are hard to bear,  and we make a grave mistake to take this to mean he is unburdening his secrets to us. He shows us what the burden feels like, that’s all he does and why ask for something else? We all can learn the lesson about emotions we can never share. Limning our solitudes with the richest palette is not the same as relentless confession.

They All Went By So Fast

The first time I read Isaiah Berlin’s The Hedgehog and the Fox, I thought it was about historical vision.  Time and life as the fox sees them are many things. In the course of a day, a fox needs to find and catch its meals and avoid becoming a meal. This lifestyle requires covering a lot of space, and having vision like a cursor, ceaselessly parsing the world’s bits. Time and life as the hedgehog sees it is one big thing. The hedgehog claims a very small territory and day after day hunkers down until Something blots out the sun for good, or, if his luck holds, the sky is not blotted out. The point of Berlin’s book is Tolstoy, who knew  time and life as an ultra-fox, but anguished to know a pattern, a moral and ultimate purpose,  lying behind all the microcosms.  Tolstoy took to a historian, Joseph de Maistre,  who  offered a strong pattern that appealed strongly to Tolstoy, and who is  the sort of writer people who are likely to read Tolstoy today would find a disturbing and primitive figure.  First time around, I left-brainedly followed Berlin’s meticulous account of the development of Tolstoy’s historical vision through Maistre to christianity.  And when I reread Berlin’s book just recently, I thought the book was about Tolstoy.  About a man who could see and then replicate a microcosm in every moment of present human life, and yet who couldn’t stand the inadequacy of his gift.  it would seem his conscience begged for a moral gravity and intention to the infinitude of real experience. Vladimir Nabokov famously included this question on the final exam he gave his undergraduate students: what was the wallpaper pattern on the Karenins’ bedroom wall? This is supposed to illustrate Nabokov’s unreachable standard of close reading, but in reality, it seems impossible for even an ordinary reader to  miss seeing the detail of  those violets , and not to remember them forever.  This was exactly the problem for Tolstoy–he could not endure seeing everything at once and as it really is without apprehending The Geometry behind it.  The lesser among us would choose the fox over the hedgehog, and Tolstoy teaches us to beware what we wish for. Beware the gift of seeing everything, and then hearing your conscience demand an explanation.

I once heard Sean Wilentz say that Bob Dylan is a great  “historian.” That was the very word he used. Historian. I thought, “What has Bob Dylan taught me about history?”   Heaven blazin’ in my head, I–I dreamt a monstrous dream.  Now here is a history lesson:  the past assaults a person, and if the person  is vulnerable to memories that exceed their own time and place, the person may endure a condition we can call historical visionary.  The gift of being a historical visionary  makes dreadful demands on its chosen ones.  There is appalling mystery–something came up out of the sea.  There is far more of the world visible than the mortal eye can take in–the ravaged land lies for miles behind.  There are atrocious accidents–killed outright he was, by his own men.  There is the witness’s claim on his one inviolable and unprovable and lost moment–stars fell over Alabama/I saw each star.  There is the singular and commonplace grief that can easily seem, given the fullest field of vision, to be the entire purpose of human actions–he’ll never get better, he’s already dead.  Bob Dylan is a historian because he delivers to me the burden of historical vision–the ineluctable, particular, unchangeable and inexplicable past. Just moments after Sean Wilentz declared Bob Dylan to be a great historian, he shared with us that he never liked ‘Cross the Green Mountain.

Bob Dylan in America is a book way out of joint, and this is exactly why it should be read with urgent and minute attention by anyone who wants to know what history is.  Much of the material has appeared elsewhere in different contexts that require different attentions to the passage of time, and in his introduction Wilentz addresses the way the book is and is not a collection of writings.  Forget about the introduction, and read the book as exactly an experience of the incompatible experiences of time that constitute history.

The early chapter on Aaron Copland barely grazes Bob Dylan. We read Wilentz’s story of Copland’s innovations and outsiderness, his explicit originality welcomed right straight into the modernist inner circle, then  followed by the turn to more accessible forms and a popularity disdained by that inner circle.  Wilentz wants to  stretch Copland into Dylan via the obvious: the fairly recent use of Copland’s Fanfare for the Common Man or Appalachian Spring to tell us (in harmony with the scent of Nag Champa) that the Show and Concert is about to begin.  But the real connection is deeper–Dylan is the riseform in this chapter about Big  Letter Modern hierarchies and categories of art,  Dylan lurks just offstage in Copland’s story about the Popular Artist Pleasing The Groundlings  and the Radical Inventor Ringing In The New. We can read and hear Dylan through the scrim of Copland’s story and here is one way that times are layered upon each other.

The Copland chapter is textbook history.  We relax into the authority of factual accuracy and properly weighed and evaluated material. But then there are the chapters of Witness, in which subjectivity is king and we know  all that’s truly present passes and changes in an instant, so we pray for a Truth more solid than the Facts. Wilentz attended the Philharmonic Halloween concert when he was 13, and then a Rolling Thunder show in Connecticut when he was a young man. The schoolmarm in me  believes that 13 is far too young to be exposed to almost anything at the Halloween show, and If You Gotta Go is the very least of it.  And in these chapters, Wilentz marvelously demonstrates the hopeless uncrossable divide between memory and history: he has a fiction writer’s ability to get everything wrong consciously and meaningfully, and he reminds us of the tremulous impossible weirdness of asking personal memory to be the staple ingredient of history.  At the Rolling Thunder show, he hears a song called Ices, and reading his account, you also hear a song called Ices.  The energy, the edginess, the mystery of the whiteface and masks–those of us not there can know all that from recordings and footage, and the Witness confirms that what we know is what was there. Witness is  Really Wrong and Really Right. Nothing like textbook history. And to face down the past, you have to face down both.

Oh dear, there is a third kind of history.  I call it homesickness, which I think is more to the point than nostalgia.  It’s the fact of  youcan’tgohomeagain but you go there anyway and endure the condescension of everyone who sneers at your quaintness. Or, if your vision and your voice is strong enough, you bring people back with you. Right there is a problem–we’re not supposed to retreat, we’re supposed to advance.  Wilentz takes on Dylan’s magnificent and radical retreat, starting with the two lookback records, Good As I Been To You, and World Gone Wrong.  His differing opinions of each I can’t agree with (I think they are both intoxicating), but that’s no matter. Wilentz specifically   takes on Lone Pilgrim,  which helped him know how he felt about losing his own father.  Now we are back to textbook history–the accurate and scrupulous and ordered account of What Happened–but assembled in a strange backass personal scramble. Bob Dylan sings (no, he breathes the song, as Wilentz describes correctly) about a buried fellow talking to a sad living fellow visiting his grave, and in this fiction there are plenty of facts and Wilentz does the sweaty work of dusting them off and presenting them clean and correct. He does this BECAUSE  Bob Dylan’s breathing of this song many many decades after the facts that underlay it helped a historian know how he felt about the recent loss of his father. This is pawning history for truth–the owner, the past, can still reclaim it, but meanwhile the owner does not own it.  You can’t teach this history. And you corrupt it by schlepping it into the present to impute meaning and feeling to conditions it knows nothing about.  I’m going to say that the Bob Dylan we have known for the last nearly 20 years, is where we go to   learn the Truth of this errant schlepping.  Fitzgerald’s image of boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past is beautiful and illuminating, but to be in one of those boats, stowing my oars and surrendering to the current, that’s something else.

No one will ever write the book on Bob Dylan and America or Bob Dylan and history.  Read Sean Wilentz’s book anyway, to think hard about Bob Dylan, America, memory, and history. I’ve got a spoiler and a dedication now. You can find my name at the way bottom of pages 141 and 269 in Professor Wilentz’s book, at the end of the footnotes. A far  greater testament to his scruples as a scholar than to anything I did. And I dedicate this post to Mr. Chum Lee, a man who knows something about the solid and liquid value of the past, and who bumped fists with Bob Dylan. Chum Lee– I am absolutely certain that your signed copy of Self Portrait will impress women.

Shakespeare In The Alley

I went to see the production of The Tempest at the Brooklyn Academy of Music (BAM) a few days ago. This production is part of something called The Bridge Project, organized by the director Sam Mendes, in which British and American actors collaborate on new productions of, this time around,  Shakespeare. Mendes has paired As You Like It and The Tempest for this season of The Bridge. Sam Mendes is something of a Bob Dylan aficionado: if you have seen his movie Truly, Madly, Deeply, you can enjoy hearing Alan Rickman, playing a ghost, reciting the opening lines to Tangled Up in Blue to a sleeping woman who in fact has red hair. (Thanks to commenter below, I stand corrected on this! It seems more honest to strike it out this way instead of just removing it.)  And although I have not seen the As You Like It, I’ve been told that there is a fairly obvious and affectionate Dylan parody in one of the songs. I hoped for an allusion of some kind in The Tempest. And it occurred to me only now that I may have found it.

Not Caliban, played here by Ron Cephas Jones, but what he’s kneeling upon, which you should be able to make out as sand. The stage setting is dominated by a circle of sand intended to give a physical space to Prospero’s magic. Prospero observes and manipulates the action from outside the circle, and enters it to interact with those he is manipulating. Need we look any further? Aren’t these characters on this island silhouetted by the sea? And aren’t memory and fate the materials Prospero must work with to bring his plot about? He repeatedly provides characters with the stories of their own pasts, and then engineers their fates. And finally Prospero’s own tools and identity, staff and book, driven deep beneath the waves as he determines his own fate, by relinquishing his past and those inscrutable powers of his. Well, I would like to say that Mendes has provided the circle of sand where Prospero may serve as ringmaster.

I may be tireless and lunatic in my desire to find companionship in La Vita Dylan, but I wonder if anyone else who has seen this production finds any substance to my flight of fancy here.

I Can Survive, And I Can Endure, I Don’t Even Think About Spring

We are having a charmless spell of weather here in the northeast, and I’m thinking about Bob Dylan and winter. Since the point of a blog is to erode the boundaries between public and private, I’ll take advantage of this license and reveal that I have a special personal affinity to Bob Dylan and winter. I was born not far from Coney Island just about three weeks after Young Bob first stumbled out of the car and  into a snowdrift that January of the coldest winter New York had seen in 17 years. Even better, the apartment my parents welcomed me to had no heat, and so Bob Dylan and I can share our earliest memories of New York as a lot of shivering and also exciting new encounters and discoveries.

I am the person everyone hates who, when a mild breeze shakes the darling buds of May, says, “Wow, did everyone else feel that draft?  I’m just going to close the windows and I’m sure no one will mind if I turn on the heat.” Bob Dylan sweats a lot in his songs, and occasionally it’s hotter than a…well, you know. But really, it’s cold that he knows. He makes me feel the cold, but he never avoids it himself.  In Tell Ol’ Bill, for me the coldest song, he dismally notes the snowflakes falling on his uncovered head, and that bitter grey and stormy sky sends a chill through the tranquil lakes and streams. I’ve seen the iron range outside Hibbing myself, on a bright and pleasant day in May, but that vast dark stony pit looks raw and grim and rusty–Cold Irons Bound even beneath a mild sky. On any good performance of Cold Irons Bound, he can get that bone-deep chill into the sound of “coooold irons bound.”  What it is to be shackled by the cold, bound for it and bound by it.

I love the simple touch of the coat in Girl of the North Country. He’s far from the north country himself, and now  he is  in what we know must be a different world, from which can’t or won’t return. His lyrical memory of her unclothed body, and his vivid memory of the winds hitting heavy, are both the unreclaimable past for him, and what’s left for him in the present is the homely wish that she has a “coat so warm.”  Contrast that winter with the wild fantasy of Isis‘s quest. Our hero enunciates “devilish cold” with great relish, to show he is up to the challenges of his ordeal, and then tells us “the snow was…outrageous,” and in that infinitesimal pause you can feel Dylan reaching for just the right word and tone to wink at us through the outlandish tale he’s spinning. That outrageous snow is one of the great witty deliveries in his vocals, and it’s such a world of temperature apart from the howling winds of the north country, where he’s left a bit of his heart behind as he pursues a true adventure unknown to the listener.

Then there is the blowwindcrack winter of age. In Tell Tale Signs’  magnificent outtake of Can’t Wait (“Let’s do it in….B flat”), we get the line “My hands are cold,” sung as though he has just that moment discovered in his own flesh the fact of mortality. Don’t be deceived by the apparently casual complaint that begins Not Dark Yet: “It’s too hot to sleep.” It’s a song which relates precise moments of regret and loss, each verse a  pinpoint awareness of the ways age can be an exhausting battle between torpor and vitality.  Being too hot to sleep is the burden of life’s warmth and quickness too much to bear, too much life in me to surrender right now, although I’m tired and want to sleep. Not cold enough yet.

And, in the depths of dark cold nights, he can be a Drosselmeyer and warm us up quite devilishly for one more round of as much life as we can stand. Pa rom pom pom pom everyone.

“Tell Me About It”–Sean Wilentz and Christopher Ricks On The Psychiatric Couch, Sort Of

Well, I was all ready to wax and wane on The Inventions of Bob Dylan, a talk featuring Christopher Ricks and Sean Wilentz, sponsored by the august Philoctetes Center for the Multidisciplinary Study of the Imagination at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute.  The discussion ranged from Tennyson to Timrod to mortality to the essential blasphemy of great religious art to Whitman to Hebraism/Hellenism. I got all my notes right here at my elbow. And then I saw the video for Must Be Santa. God bless us all–the wig, the dancing,  the who-threw-the-glass, the cigar.  Two eminent scholars discuss this  artist of unparalleled fecundity and complexity, whose expressiveness illuminates single syllables and whose vision transforms our experience of the spiritual life.  And here he is, in a platinum blonde wig, doing what could be the hora.  And smoking a cigar, which, like a bell, tolls us back to the land of Freud and couches.

http://philoctetes.org/Past_Programs/The_Inventions_of_Bob_Dylan

The Philoctetes Center holds its talks on the top floor of a brownstone on East 82nd St. There was much to occupy one’s attention while waiting for the talk to begin. On the walls of this room were enormous metal decorations, like monstrous bundt pans.  People scurried about with great purpose, doing things with microphones and chairs. Someone scurried in with xeroxed papers and laid them on four chairs. Each paper read in large bold capital letters: RESERVED FOR GREIL MARCUS. I had just figured out  that the other three chairs were being held for Mr. Marcus’s food taster, juggler, and punka wallah, when a fresh scurrying broke out and I heard one staff member whisper to another “He’s not coming. Not coming.” And the papers were whisked off the seats, freeing them for ordinary buttocks of the realm. Professors Wilentz and Ricks manifested themselves, Prof. Wilentz quite as affable and comfortable as he was in the much more informal setting of our class at 92Y, and Prof. Ricks wearing a suit and no tie, which always has that Cosa Nostra look. They took places on facing couches, had little microphones clipped to them.

The gentleman introducing the talk explained proudly that the bundt pans were left over from the previous talk, in which author Brian Greene and scholar Elaine Scarry discussed the beauty of mathematics. There is nothing lightweight about the Philoctetes Center, as you can see.  I’m sorry I missed that talk, for what better way to introduce Bob Dylan than with a conversation on Facts, Truth, and Beauty with experts on physics and philosophy. The geometry of innocent flesh on the bone, or something like.

Profs. Ricks and Wilentz are a contrast in forms of amiability, and that kind of quick wittedness that is able to find exactly the object it needs at any moment without rummaging about. Prof Wilentz brings up Woody Guthrie’s Pretty Boy Floyd in connection with Christmas in the Heart, while Prof Ricks quotes Blake on the topic of appropriation (“Though they are not mine, I call them mine”).  Prof Wilentz plugs his son’s Web site, while Prof Ricks stands up to act out what happened when his elderly father attended one of his talks.  Those of you who’ve seen and heard Prof Ricks might agree with me that Christopher Ricks is ideally cast to play Christopher Ricks in The Christopher Ricks Story. I want to state here that Ricks in person is a welcome counteragent to the narrator  Ricks, whose  riffing and punning characterizes so much of Visions of Sin, and  pushes the book towards an archness that can leave those who don’t listen deeply to Dylan complacent in their resistance to his art.  In conversation, watched by a clock, there are checks and balances to Ricks’ riffs, there is his visible emphasis on the seriousness of what Dylan does and has done. The talk that ensued was well-served by  their matched wits, different styles, and a shared commitment to the self-replenishing work of listening closely to Bob Dylan’s music and finding things to say about it. The topic of The Inventions of Bob Dylan, moderated by Matthew von Unwerth, a scholar and a psychoanalyst-in-training, was supposed to be about “Dylan’s ongoing conversation with tradition.”  von Unwerth barely recited his introduction when Prof Ricks, not unamiably, put the kibosh on “inventions.” “Dylan doesn’t invent, he discovers.”  And so began a fine and discursive ramble through Perhaps The Discoveries of Bob Dylan and Other Things. There were swells of insight and feeling and a steady command of our attention.  A few of the swells:

Ricks says to von Unwerth, who related his affinity for Bob Dylan: “You didn’t discover Dylan, he discovered you. As he discovered all of us. Bob Dylan is not afraid of being just like everyone else.”  I like this twist on the commonplace of art’s universality. We hear ourselves named by great art, don’t we. It recognizes us as ourselves.

 

 

Wilentz:  ”Bob Dylan is an historian unlike any other.”  And this comment refreshed the by-now tedious discussion of Bob Dylan’s channeling the vocabulary and music of bygone bygones.  How is he a historian? Because he can make the conditions of the past present in my attention. The world of Together Through Life summons a world that just doesn’t match up to the world I’m sitting in while I play the record. Village priests and ships in harbors and memories that overtake this moment right now, and Houston seems incredibly far away–one thing a historian can do is simply make you believe that the conditions of the past were  actual and livable, not the quaint compromises or ignorances of people who knew and had so much less than we do. Eliot came up a fair amount during the afternoon, so we can pull him in here too, with his famous comment on our knowing more than what people knew in the past–”yes, and they are what we know.” Perhaps one thing a historian can do is make this palpable.  Wilentz meant this in a less abstract way, of course, and he praised Dylan’s concrete historical knowledge: “Factually, he’s pretty good.”

Ricks claimed the Christmas album is not really “religious” and a woman quickly pointed out that the album ends on the word “amen.” “But it still does not have the depth of really religious songs,” said Ricks. Which led him to this fascinating observation: “All great religious art has to be accusable of blasphemy.”  Now this seems to satisfy the notion that great art ignites revolutions in consciousness. Great art is not safe, it is not more-of-the-same-me-in-the-world. In Ricks’ view, these revolutions would be “discoveries” and not “novelties”, not the intoxication of a trick, but real blasphemy–a calling into question of received truths. I admire very much, I enjoy and learn from, writing on Dylan by authors whose religious lives are fed by his work, in ways that are different from my own spiritual life. I’m thinking of Stephen Webb, Michael Gilmour, Stephen Hazan-Arnoff. And while these writers feel their religious consciousnesses are animated, or refreshed, or challenged to new ways of being religious, they do not see themselves in contest with Dylan’s songs. I venture to say that Ricks’ idea appeals to atheists who wish to make good sense of the sensuous power of great religious art. If I can feel that the Sistine Chapel, George Herbert’s poems, and Bob Dylan’s songs rouse and transform me, despite that the traditions called upon in these works do not themselves answer the big questions of my life, it would be consoling and aggrandizing to believe that these works are somehow deeply transgressive of the traditions. I say take up a maybe (maybe not) harder challenge, and start with the human commonality (Prof Ricks likes this word) from which springs the spiritual impulse and the Sistine Chapel and In the Garden.

Wilentz: On the issue of appropriation/plagiarism, Prof Wilentz is wonderfully–inspiringly–irritable. Bob Dylan “inhabits” everything he steals. Foreign material becomes his. Prof. Wilentz talked of Confessions of a Yakuza, “My old man’s  like some feudal lord, he’s got more lives than a cat.” Well, the phrase “feudal lord” refers to something in Japanese  culture and history that is “completely different” from what it would mean to an American audience. This seems obvious, but I think Wilentz is pointing to the way an alien twig, when grafted onto one of Dylan’s songs, needs a botanist to show us where the graft begins and ends. The phrase calls attention  to itself, while it also scans and rhymes along with the other verses, and then supports the images in Floater of the fatigue that power can induce. Prof Wilentz did say he sometimes wishes Bob would credit some of his sources some of the time.

There was more, much more, to this winding road, and I was told the talk was streaming on YouTube but I can’t find it there. A Q&A session that, like all question and answer sessions, had almost no comments worth the interruption of the featured speakers.

Here’s the moment I’ll not ever forget. Christopher Ricks held up the paperback of Visions of Sin, and made great witty sport of the fact that the photo of Bob on the cover, in the stairwell of Cafe Wha? I believe, was also used in the CD of No Direction Home-and the cigarette in his mouth was airbrushed from the reproduction on the CD. We all had a good laugh at that Puritanical nonsense, and then Sean Wilentz said, with a warmth both mild and serious, “I wish he would quit smoking.” And Ricks’ wit left him for one moment–you could see it leave his face–and he said, “Yes, I do too, I wish he would quit smoking.”  And that, my little Neptunian, is what it looks like when you actually share the same time-space continuum with an artist whose work can marshal the forces of the Philoctetes Center for the Multidisciplinary Study of the Imagination: you are blessed in ways you can’t find words for, and you’re too close to mortality for comfort.

And I feel certain that both Christopher Ricks and Sean Wilentz would have much  preferred to be cast as extras in the Must Be Santa video than be asked to explain Bob Dylan. Watch it yourself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLZ8LPIh4Xc&feature=player_embedded

Tuesdays on 92nd St, We Do Not Abjure Educated Rap

images At left, Pace University, a hall of learning located on the southernmost protuberance of  Manhattan. It is a long and arduous journey from here at the foot of the Brooklyn Bridge, to 92nd St and Lexington Ave; even if you get a seat on the express, the subway is crowded at all times of the day. After a long day of pedagogy and bureaucracy, the chair of Pace’s English department, Walter Raubicheck, offered his time to our little Dylan crew uptown. Our class this Tuesday involved Walter’s presentation on Mr Tambourine Man, primarily the poetic life of the song. Full disclosure laws compel me to reveal that I have known Walter for several years through the Dylan meet-up group (next meet-up Monday 11/9 6 PM Kettle of Fish 59 Christopher you can meet Walter yourself!).  Acquaintances or no acquaintances, discussing assonance, Keats, and consciousness with strangers at 9 PM on a weekday speaks of Walter’s  energy level and generosity.

images-12Here is another building, it’s the house where Keats died in Rome. Let’s say that a difference between a great poet and a lesser poet, is that the voice of the great poet gets past so much insulation in us and finally reaches that chamber where we actually *hear* a single human speaking into us. And let’s say that one way we recognize this greatness isn’t only in encounters with the art, but in uncanny dropoffs of time: Keats’ death was prolonged and painful and mainly conscious, and the awfulness of this suffering rings through the windows of this house like a real feeling, not because the painful death of a decent young man is by default a tragedy, but because the young man’s living self is something we can meet in his poetry, and so his death can be a strange true pain to us now. How did I end up on the Spanish Steps??  We need to get to the jingle jangle morning…

images-13 Walter introduced his talk by reading from Keats’ Ode to a Nightingale. As you can see at the left here, a nightingale is a rather meager and  drab bird to withstand the weight of so much enduring Romantic thought and feeling and beauty. And those little wings have to carry it high, by the light of the moon. Before arguing for a connection between  Mr Tambourine Man and the Romantic tradition, Walter reminded us that Dylan himself is “self-taught” in literature. He referred to an interview Dylan gave to  Robert Hilburn in which the topic of traditional English poetry came up; Chronicles also offers tastes of his fluency. Walter’s point here being merely to establish a legitimate sense of tradition, rather than to impute grand precocity to Dylan’s naively captivating song. Mr Tambourine Man is no more naively captivating than Keats’ Ode.

Keats’ nightingale represents the effortless and thought-less freedom the speaker, weary from consciousness of the sheer facts of human mortality, will never know. The nightingale represents the “predicament” of the speaker, and then for one moment, transports the speaker from his predicament. Or transports the predicament away from the speaker? The tambourine may serve the same purposes in Dylan’s song. The tambourine calls to  the singer in his weariness, his numbness, his inertia and exhaustion. Then the tambourine, like the nightingale’s song, offers the short-lived “energy to pull the speaker out of his psychic state.”

images-7 And so in both the poem and the song, there is a speaker/singer  awoken through his own attention to a sound. It’s a sound he listens for and hears with peculiar openness, and so it is not a general alarm that awakes him, but a personal address. In both the poem and the song, the speaker/singer needs this address in order to “get access to that level of psyche”–from which poems and songs are seeded. It isn’t the endstop of freed consciousness the nightingale and the tambourine provide, but these sounds open a portal to  language and music, so the consciousness can be articulated and shared. Shared. Let me show you what something I have felt is like, I want you to feel it too.

images-2The song’s first two stanzas  may be a catalogue of everything the singer wants to free himself from, and the pleas to be freed. Branded on his feet, as though seared with a brand, to join a herd of other weary, numb, blind creatures.  The patterns of sound and the voice’s careful cadence entrance us as the tambourine begins to entrance him. Hands can’t feel to grip. Toes too numb to step. Single syllables are an effort. The infinitesimal pauses between words are a nanosecond long enough to convey the effort of singing. But there’s the swirling ship, the promise of air in the sibilance. And the voice soars to announce he’s “ready to go anywhere.” He’s already moved away from being part of the branded herd, and is ready for his own parade.

Walter pointed out that Dylan rarely performs the 3rd verse. The ragged clown behind. We talked about why that may be so, since the omission of that verse is so consistent it invites a little speculation beyond throwing up our hands at Dylan’s idiosyncrasies. We  wondered if that verse, with Dylan’s self-portrait of the newborn artist, laughin spinnin swingin, is too personal? That it moves away from the universal in the song?  Walter pointed out how much he enjoys the lines that reassure: don’t be afraid, it’s not aimed at anyone, there’s no “negative motivation” here. There’s benevolence  and generosity in this inspiration.

images-8“Take me disappearing.” We take this kind of originality in language for granted sometimes. This clause is just wrong grammatically, and it wakes us up to what’s happening to the singer: absurd to ask someone to take me…nowhere. They’re with me, so it’s not nowhere….  But of course we never quibble with this, because we’re already on that razor’s edge of passive and active, of internal and external, of here and not here, that the singer wishes me to be balanced on as he goes through it. And Walter pointed out the participles throughout the song: vanished, swirling, laughing, spinning, swinging, driven…  There are many verbs in this song that are not active. Remember, we are on the razor’s edge of passive and active. Walter pointed out the dark and frightening places the singer has to get through before ending up on that windy beach. Through those smoke rings of his own mind, there’s a frozen, haunted, deformed, twisted, sorrowful world. How fast does he get through this? Not fast enough not to notice the cold and the fear and sorrow. And remember that he’s been appealing to the tambourine man repeatedly, to play for him. To get him where he needs to go, even though he knows he has to get through the haunted places first. This is just not about intoxication, it’s about facing a kind of awakening. It’s a fairly brave song, not so much a song about a euphoric dropping out. The beach is not calm. The sky is too sharp and bright. Only the singer  knows what circus sands look like. Memory and fate are drowned, but he still knows there’s a past and a future, a today and a tomorrow. Only one hand waves free.  Picture the difference between two hands and one: there’s something childish, puerile, cliched about dancing on a beach waving both your arms over your head. There’s something oddly graceful and dignified about one hand waving free. And a touch of restraint. Remember this song is about consciousness. Not unconsciousness.

images-15Walter brought us back to history and Tradition, and the nightingale in Jokerman. Walter hears in this song Dylan distancing himself from the Romantic figure of the 60s. He’s got that freed awareness, but without truth, what good is it?  The grown up Jokerman’s dance is a little sinister, a little grotesque, more ambiguous, more un-inviting than the boy’s dance on the windy beach.

The song more than others takes me through smoke rings of other images that have become indelible parts of the song. images-11 This portrait of a girl by Lucian Freud, it just is haunted frightened trees to me. The line in the song just is this portrait. The branch is perfectly lovely and unfrozen, but her face will be afraid forever and the tree can’t protect her.  I visit this girl often in MoMA, and as soon as I see her, I hear the song, and I stand there for a moment hearing the song and looking at her and wishing I could give her the song to help her.

images-16 Then there’s Rudy. This is what the song conjured for me the first time I really paid attention to it, and what it conjures, effortlessly, every time I hear it. At the end of the Circe episode in Ulysses, Leopold contemplates the passed-out Stephen, is overcome by tenderness for the boy, the tenderness leads him to a vision of his dead son, Rudy. The Rudy he sees is an 11-year old boy, wearing a Roman helmet, and an Eton suit, and reading a book “right to left”– obviously reading Hebrew,  Bloom’s native/ancestral language. In this image is collapsed history, empires, civilization, and the weight of what Bloom sees in the son he has lost, the past and the future he  lost through the death of his son.  The moment of human love has enough weight to collapse time in this way.  Bloom endures a sudden awakening to a consciousness of time larger than the present, and there is the sleeping  young artist, and there is benevolence and compassion and strangeness, and there is magnificently compressed and astonishingly communicative imagery. Much here that echoes in Mr Tambourine Man. And there is a beach, and there is sand, and there is a diamond. Here’s the passage itself:

… shadows… the woods

… white breast… dim…

(He stretches out his arms, sighs again and curls his body. Bloom holding his hat and ashplant stands erect. A dog barks in the distance. Bloom tightens and loosens his grip on the ashplant. He looks down on Stephen’s face and form.)

BLOOM (Communes with the night.) Face reminds me of his poor mother. In the shady wood. The deep white breast. Ferguson, I think I caught. A girl. Some girl. Best thing could happen him… (He murmurs.)… swear that I will always hail, ever conceal, never reveal, any part or parts, art or arts… (He murmurs.) in the rough sands of the sea. a cabletow’s length from the shore… where the tide ebbs … and flows…

(Silent, thoughtful, alert, he stands on guard, his fingers at his lips in the attitude of secret master. Against the dark wall a figure appears slowly, a fairy boy of eleven, a changeling, kidnapped, dressed in an Eton suit with glass shoes and a little bronze helmet, holding a book in his hand. He reads from right to left inaudibly, smiling, kissing the page.)

BLOOM (Wonderstruck, calls inaudibly.) Rudy!

RUDY (Gazes unseeing into Bloom’s eyes and goes on reading, kissing, smiling. He has a delicate mauveface. On his suit he has diamond and ruby buttons. In his free left hand he holds a slim ivory cane with a violet howknot. A white lambkin peeps out of his waistcoat pocket.)

My favorite performances of the song are three. One is the studio version on Bringing It All Back Home, because of the care, the fastidiousness of the voice. He will get this across to me, this impossible  vision. He is patient and loving with his song and with his listener. Two is the Isle of Wight performance. This is the nightingale Keats heard. Third is a performance in Memphis, April 25 2006. He found the darkest rhythm in his own soul to get this song across. To get it across years and years, to bring anyone who was listening to wherever it is he was going.