<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesdays on 92nd St, We Do Not Abjure Educated Rap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/</link>
	<description>All Art Aspires To The Condition of Bob Dylan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas S.</title>
		<link>http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gardenerisgone.com/?p=1023#comment-368</guid>
		<description>We had some delays in post-prodcution.  We are at the finishing end, as somebody once said.  We will have it published by year&#039;s end.  Sorry for the delays.  We&#039;ll mail you a contributor&#039;s copy as soon as we get them from the printer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had some delays in post-prodcution.  We are at the finishing end, as somebody once said.  We will have it published by year&#8217;s end.  Sorry for the delays.  We&#8217;ll mail you a contributor&#8217;s copy as soon as we get them from the printer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hinchey</title>
		<link>http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hinchey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gardenerisgone.com/?p=1023#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Lucas:

Ha! No problem. Boys will be girls, as the feller says! Glad you liked my piece. 

But if it&#039;s not out of order to ask, what&#039;s the prognosis on Montague Street? When can we expect to see it in the flesh? Or when are you going to announce it to the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas:</p>
<p>Ha! No problem. Boys will be girls, as the feller says! Glad you liked my piece. </p>
<p>But if it&#8217;s not out of order to ask, what&#8217;s the prognosis on Montague Street? When can we expect to see it in the flesh? Or when are you going to announce it to the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas S.</title>
		<link>http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gardenerisgone.com/?p=1023#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Hi John.  I&#039;m the Dylan fan formerly known as Dorothy Amigo.  I apologize for the alias, just an chat-room force of habit.  I recently re-read you wonderful piece on Oh Mercy for Montague Street.  Thank you so much for the contribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John.  I&#8217;m the Dylan fan formerly known as Dorothy Amigo.  I apologize for the alias, just an chat-room force of habit.  I recently re-read you wonderful piece on Oh Mercy for Montague Street.  Thank you so much for the contribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hinchey</title>
		<link>http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hinchey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gardenerisgone.com/?p=1023#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Dorothy--you&#039;re right, of course. I missed that--perhaps because I was thinking about the lyrical songs, which is where almost all his use of the bridge occurs--and not his other genres, including whichever one &quot;Ballad of a Thin Man&quot; belongs to (prophetic rant?). But in any case, I sure did overlook it.
Makes me wonder if I missed some others, and if I didn&#039;t, what prompted Dylan to first use a bridge in a kind of song that--no matter who&#039;s writing it--just never has a bridge, which is a pop song technique--one that apparently goes back to the Italian sonnet. (In his A Test of Poetry, Louis Zukovsky prints a 16th-century English sonnet that he says is the &quot;best English equivalent of the Italian sonnet,&quot; which he prints, following the rhyme scheme, as 2 quatrains, a couplet [bridge], and a final quatrain,&quot; and he praises this poem for its superior &quot;melodic invention&quot; to the familiar English sonnet, which he calls a &quot;degenerat[ion] into a short discursive verse form dealing with moral subjects.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dorothy&#8211;you&#8217;re right, of course. I missed that&#8211;perhaps because I was thinking about the lyrical songs, which is where almost all his use of the bridge occurs&#8211;and not his other genres, including whichever one &#8220;Ballad of a Thin Man&#8221; belongs to (prophetic rant?). But in any case, I sure did overlook it.<br />
Makes me wonder if I missed some others, and if I didn&#8217;t, what prompted Dylan to first use a bridge in a kind of song that&#8211;no matter who&#8217;s writing it&#8211;just never has a bridge, which is a pop song technique&#8211;one that apparently goes back to the Italian sonnet. (In his A Test of Poetry, Louis Zukovsky prints a 16th-century English sonnet that he says is the &#8220;best English equivalent of the Italian sonnet,&#8221; which he prints, following the rhyme scheme, as 2 quatrains, a couplet [bridge], and a final quatrain,&#8221; and he praises this poem for its superior &#8220;melodic invention&#8221; to the familiar English sonnet, which he calls a &#8220;degenerat[ion] into a short discursive verse form dealing with moral subjects.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy Amigo</title>
		<link>http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy Amigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gardenerisgone.com/?p=1023#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Interesting, John.  Isn&#039;t the &quot;You have many contacts&quot; in Ballad of a Thin Man a bridge or is that a false bridge again?  In later version he always kicks it up a notch and belts in out, and it leads into another verse, not a chorus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, John.  Isn&#8217;t the &#8220;You have many contacts&#8221; in Ballad of a Thin Man a bridge or is that a false bridge again?  In later version he always kicks it up a notch and belts in out, and it leads into another verse, not a chorus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hinchey</title>
		<link>http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hinchey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gardenerisgone.com/?p=1023#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another absorbing report. This does sound like it was an especially rich talk. I would take issue with one thing, though. I don&#039;t think Dylan started skipping the 3rd verse because there was anything problematic about it. For one thing, for a while in the mid 90s or so (I think it was then) he regularly sang the 3rd verse--but dropped the 2nd.  I think the issue here is 3 verses rather than 4. In a number of his early  4-verse lyrical songs, the 3rd verse is actually (structurally) a bridge. Dylan never used a musical bridge until Blonde on Blonde, and I think he eventually came to find those early 4-verse songs musically unsatisfying to sing. So he would drop a verse, usually the pseudo-bridge. (The 3rd verse of &quot;Love Minus Zero&quot; is another one, as I remember, that he often drops in performance.) But the 3rd verse of &quot;Tambourine Man&quot; is too brilliant to banish altogether, so tries making it the 2nd verse of 3 and--since a bridge is a kind of superhighway, or downtown bypass,  in the structure of the emotional narrative--he gets (I think) a more breathtaking song.
Interestingly, the 3rd verse of &quot;Baby Blue&quot; is not a bridge--it is more like a bog--and he never skips that. (I just heard him sing it tonight--the performance did not take off until the last verse, where his singing--for the first time I can recall hearing--wonderfully brought out the empathy that underlies the song&#039;s compassion. In other versions I&#039;ve heard, his singing is all tough love, with or without a hint of sadism.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another absorbing report. This does sound like it was an especially rich talk. I would take issue with one thing, though. I don&#8217;t think Dylan started skipping the 3rd verse because there was anything problematic about it. For one thing, for a while in the mid 90s or so (I think it was then) he regularly sang the 3rd verse&#8211;but dropped the 2nd.  I think the issue here is 3 verses rather than 4. In a number of his early  4-verse lyrical songs, the 3rd verse is actually (structurally) a bridge. Dylan never used a musical bridge until Blonde on Blonde, and I think he eventually came to find those early 4-verse songs musically unsatisfying to sing. So he would drop a verse, usually the pseudo-bridge. (The 3rd verse of &#8220;Love Minus Zero&#8221; is another one, as I remember, that he often drops in performance.) But the 3rd verse of &#8220;Tambourine Man&#8221; is too brilliant to banish altogether, so tries making it the 2nd verse of 3 and&#8211;since a bridge is a kind of superhighway, or downtown bypass,  in the structure of the emotional narrative&#8211;he gets (I think) a more breathtaking song.<br />
Interestingly, the 3rd verse of &#8220;Baby Blue&#8221; is not a bridge&#8211;it is more like a bog&#8211;and he never skips that. (I just heard him sing it tonight&#8211;the performance did not take off until the last verse, where his singing&#8211;for the first time I can recall hearing&#8211;wonderfully brought out the empathy that underlies the song&#8217;s compassion. In other versions I&#8217;ve heard, his singing is all tough love, with or without a hint of sadism.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy Amigo</title>
		<link>http://gardenerisgone.com/2009/11/05/tuesdays-on-92nd-st-we-do-not-abjure-educated-rap/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy Amigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gardenerisgone.com/?p=1023#comment-361</guid>
		<description>It was a great class.  I never notice the self-reflexive elements in the song before.  The ending talk regarding Visions of Johanna was also enjoyable.  In retrospect, I never realized how similar Brownsville Girl it to Visions of Johanna, both songs being about a romanticized woman, and the singer is with a woman who he does not love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a great class.  I never notice the self-reflexive elements in the song before.  The ending talk regarding Visions of Johanna was also enjoyable.  In retrospect, I never realized how similar Brownsville Girl it to Visions of Johanna, both songs being about a romanticized woman, and the singer is with a woman who he does not love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
